Splak.net

Home of .:Splak|
It is currently Tue Sep 30, 2025 5:28 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 3:13 pm 
Offline
OmG H4x !!!111one!!eleventyone!

Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 4:09 pm
Posts: 439
Location: Chattanooga TN
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJHqbqGCCMc

The Chevy fans are going to hate this.

_________________
.:Splak|JamesBond


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 3:50 pm 
Offline
Mega Chuck Norris
Mega Chuck Norris
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 3650
Location: Madison, MS
Camaro SS 60 mph in 4.6 seconds, quarter mile in 13.3
Mustang GT 60 mph in 4.7 seconds, quarter mile in 13.1

Would not say anyone was left in the dust, but the new camaro is a heavier powerful car, its more in the class of what the GTO was, too much weight IMO. The new mustang has finally done everything right for 2011 imo (besides the ass of the car looks worse), shed some weight and gained some power. After 16 years the mustang is back... but I will not be buying either, these cars are supposed to be competitive cars for cheap. 30-33k for a camaro/mustang is laughable, when you can pick up a slightly used (less than 50k miles) C6 for 28k, or even a LS3 Z51 car for mid 30s, if you can deal a real sports car (aka only 2 seats).

_________________
-- .:Splak|StackableNut --
Cornholio wrote:
blah thats nothing, i built houses for pirates, then do pirating myself. Then I shoot my self and perform bullet removal surgery on myself. After that I go to boot camps to train kids to kill. Then i go and fight on the Iraq war for both sides. After all i go later and drink some 7up cause ill be thirsty as shit.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 11:00 am 
Offline
1337 Hooker
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 2:06 am
Posts: 2426
Location: Chievres, Belgium
Mustangs always receive higher consumer ratings than any of the new muscles.

_________________
ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 11:53 am 
Offline
Splakking Spree
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 5:49 pm
Posts: 1676
Location: Kingsville, Tx
I completely agree with Cole. But being a former owner of 2 5.0's, and a former classic Mustang owner. Im still gonna end up buying a 5.0 stang around next spring break.

_________________
.:Splak|StoRk


ColeLT1 - Wyatt talked like that before it was cool


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 1:11 pm 
Offline
OmG H4x !!!111one!!eleventyone!

Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 4:09 pm
Posts: 439
Location: Chattanooga TN
Ive already had my discussion on what I think is the cheapest for the most power sports car for less money which is a honda or other tuners. I don't like the rear end on the mustang but I might get a body kit for it. And the price for the new SS comaros are like 45,000+. You can get a brand new 5.0 starting out at 29,000, You get better handling and better gas mileage and almost as much horsepower as a 6.2 liter V8 for $15,000 less. I just want the new 5.0 because it an affordable payment (500 a month) has way more than enough horsepower for me coming from driving a 230 hp car and its still gets ok gas mileage and I can still fit 3 passengers in it instead of 1 like a vette.

_________________
.:Splak|JamesBond


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 2:01 pm 
Offline
Mega Chuck Norris
Mega Chuck Norris
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 3650
Location: Madison, MS
JamesBond wrote:
Ive already had my discussion on what I think is the cheapest for the most power sports car for less money which is a honda or other tuners.


Yes, it gave me a good laugh.

That was not meant to be a direct attack, simply dollar for dollar tuners give you some of the absolute worst performance gains out there, compared to performance cars.

For example: My G35 would take $2,000 (exhaust, CAI, and upper and lower intake manifold), to bump from 306hp to 330hp. While my roommates C6 with the same mods would go from 400hp to 500hp, while getting better gas mileage than me, with a smaller, lighter, cheaper engine, that arguably will last longer (does 1800rpms going 80, while mine is running at 3000). If we were both were to put forced induction on our cars, I would see around 450hp, while he would be well past the 600s. Compare this to a 1990 civic vs 1990 5.0,while reducing the power of each by half, but the gains in a 5.0 are awesome, while a civic, takes thousands just to make 300hp.

A Civic with a turbo b22 does not equal a Skyline GTR, even if it can somehow match it down a quarter mile, its still a shitbox with 400hp that will be lucky if the motor does not blow up in a few thousand miles.

_________________
-- .:Splak|StackableNut --
Cornholio wrote:
blah thats nothing, i built houses for pirates, then do pirating myself. Then I shoot my self and perform bullet removal surgery on myself. After that I go to boot camps to train kids to kill. Then i go and fight on the Iraq war for both sides. After all i go later and drink some 7up cause ill be thirsty as shit.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 7:26 pm 
Offline
OmG H4x !!!111one!!eleventyone!

Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 4:09 pm
Posts: 439
Location: Chattanooga TN
Yes civics might take $13,000 all in all to beat a 30,000 or 40,000$ car. Hondas have really nice H22 motors that are built to take 18-22 pounds of boost. But the civic upgrades are cheaper and the corvette superchargers are really exspensive.
If you're going to dog a car you will have to replace parts. I don't think Hondas are shitcans, I just think there a fast cheap car for people that want to build a fast car for under 20,000$.

_________________
.:Splak|JamesBond


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 8:24 pm 
Offline
Mega Chuck Norris
Mega Chuck Norris
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 3650
Location: Madison, MS
JamesBond wrote:
Yes civics might take $13,000 all in all to beat a 30,000 or 40,000$ car. Hondas have really nice H22 motors that are built to take 18-22 pounds of boost. But the civic upgrades are cheaper and the corvette superchargers are really exspensive.
If you're going to dog a car you will have to replace parts. I don't think Hondas are shitcans, I just think there a fast cheap car for people that want to build a fast car for under 20,000$.


And what took you 13k, takes the old 5.0 half that.

_________________
-- .:Splak|StackableNut --
Cornholio wrote:
blah thats nothing, i built houses for pirates, then do pirating myself. Then I shoot my self and perform bullet removal surgery on myself. After that I go to boot camps to train kids to kill. Then i go and fight on the Iraq war for both sides. After all i go later and drink some 7up cause ill be thirsty as shit.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue May 25, 2010 8:56 pm 
Offline
Splakking Spree
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 5:49 pm
Posts: 1676
Location: Kingsville, Tx
^ Not to mention its rear wheel drive :mrgreen:

_________________
.:Splak|StoRk


ColeLT1 - Wyatt talked like that before it was cool


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon May 31, 2010 10:37 am 
Offline
Splakking Spree
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 5:49 pm
Posts: 1676
Location: Kingsville, Tx

YouTube Video URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVVzt2QfS7E&fmt=18

_________________
.:Splak|StoRk


ColeLT1 - Wyatt talked like that before it was cool


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group