JcP wrote:
all the evidence says you're wrong
Who has this evidence? "They"?
I am not going to deny the fact that we could do a better job of preserving our natural resources. That is common sense. Unfortunately, with the growth of the worlds population we are depleting them at an alarming rate. That being said, I REFUSE to start walking to work, live in a hut without electricity and pay a "Carbon tax" for my flatulence.
There was a line drawn at common sense that was crossed a LONG time ago.
Especially when there is no SOLID proof that global warming is occurring because of the reasons they are stating. Hell, we had a pretty cold winter this year.
From the Canadian Free Press:
Timothy Ball PH.D, Climatology wrote:
Global Warming, as we think we know it, doesn't exist. And I am not the only one trying to make people open up their eyes and see the truth. But few listen, despite the fact that I was one of the first Canadian Ph.Ds. in Climatology and I have an extensive background in climatology, especially the reconstruction of past climates and the impact of climate change on human history and the human condition. Few listen, even though I have a Ph.D, (Doctor of Science) from the University of London, England and was a climatology professor at the University of Winnipeg. For some reason (actually for many), the World is not listening.
also
Timothy Ball PH.D, Climatology wrote:
Believe it or not, Global Warming is not due to human contribution of Carbon Dioxide (CO2). This in fact is the greatest deception in the history of science. We are wasting time, energy and trillions of dollars while creating unnecessary fear and consternation over an issue with no scientific justification.
also
Timothy Ball PH.D, Climatology wrote:
Another cry in the wildenerness is Richard Lindzen's. He is an atmospheric physicist and a professor of meteorology at MIT, renowned for his research in dynamic meteorology - especially atmospheric waves. He is also a member of the National Academy of Sciences and has held positions at the University of Chicago, Harvard University and MIT.................As Lindzen said many years ago: "the consensus was reached before the research had even begun." Now, any scientist who dares to question the prevailing wisdom is marginalized and called a sceptic, when in fact they are simply being good scientists. This has reached frightening levels with these scientists now being called climate change denier with all the holocaust connotations of that word. The normal scientific method is effectively being thwarted.
Actual article:
http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/glo ... 020507.htmLin Zhen-Shan and Sun Xian of the Nanjing Normal University in China wrote:
They report that “Despite the increasing trend of atmospheric CO2 concentration, the components IMF2, IMF3 and IMF4 of global temperature changes are all in falling” and that “the effect of greenhouse warming is deficient in counterchecking the natural cooling of global climate change in the coming 20 years. Consequently, we believe global climate changes will be in a trend of falling in the following 20 years.”
They were on a roll and they continued stating “The global climate warming is not solely affected by the CO2 greenhouse effect. The best example is temperature obviously cooling however atmospheric CO2 concentration is ascending from 1940s to 1970s. Although the CO2 greenhouse effect on global climate changes is unsuspicious, it could have been excessively exaggerated. It is high time to re-consider the global climate changes.”
Actual Article:
http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index ... l-cooling/
My only point here being... To prove that there is obviously evidence saying that your evidence is wrong.
_________________
bob wrote:
Sorry,
my brother called you a retard.
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
"camp pwn infamous in the face w/ H bombs"
