Display wrote:
B)
Quote:
People like to claim that they do jobs that Americans refuse to do. I assure you, there is not a job out there that i will refuse to do if times get bad enough.
That's what people are saying. Times aren't bad though, so who wants to do these jobs now?
I've worked some of the shittiest jobs out there. I laid asphalt as my first job. Worked my way up to cutting grass on the side of the interstate with a weed eater. Then i went on to sewage/water department here in my local town. Where, since i was the only white guy on an all black crew, i cleaned sewage pipes. (seriously... they called me "whiteboy") After that i went on to maintain local parks. This was all pre-college. So.. its not a matter of what i wont do unless times are tough. I'm slightly more educated now than i was then...and am not able to make ends meet off of a $5.25/hr wage. I am not above the work, and i assure you...i can work ANY of you under the table. With that being said Display, i will bring up my prior statement of how i wont do those jobs regardless of my education/ability levels...
FOR LESS THAN MINIMUM WAGE!!!Now come on, im not going to give too much credit to Americans.. I'll agree.. they are lazy... but they aren't stupid either. Why would they take a cut in pay to get off of SSI and go to work.
So, my argument stands. Yes... they do jobs Americans wont do... for less than any human should be getting paid to do that particular job...and THAT is why people can get away with saying that. Its a Michael Moore ish type statement.
Quote:
I'm not too sure the statistics abouts illegal immigrants on the cost of our healthcare, but I do know this. My neighbor is a professional contractor and architect. I was telling him that companies are making more money buy using illegal immigrants as cheap workers. He told me I had no idea what I was talking about. Said that yes, they make a profit, but only by a small margin. Capitalism blows the rest away, and that without the usage of them - most houses would cost a lot more than they do now. Since he builds a shit load of houses for a living, I'm pretty sure his words are solid.
Let me also ask this question... Does he hire illegal immigrants to do his labor?
Because, honestly... that would be the equivalent of asking a bad guy if they are doing something wrong. OF COURSE THEY AREN'T!!!!
I agree, most houses would cost more, but understand that if our less than minimal wage workers made what they should to do this job and paid in taxes.. that would help our government. With the shift in wages, that would also help bring our economy out of a recession because that would be a large sum of money infiltrating the market. Which in turn would create more money on the top end too. SO.. it would be bumpy for a while, but it would sort itself.
Quote:
And I'd also like to quote:
If you lose your job to an immigrant, it's probably because he or she was willing to work harder for less money. Don't want to pay them full wages? Then don't hire them. If they do equal work, then they deserve equal pay. It's just that simple, and I'm not going to sit back like every other racist piece of shit bitching about having to work harder because there's a little competition for my job, immigrant or otherwise. I know I can do my job better than anyone, and if an immigrant thinks he can do a better job than I can, I welcome him to try.
What kind of chicken shit *p00n4n!* is afraid of competition? Can't get a job because you lost out to an immigrant? Well TOUGH SHIT. Nobody wants to pay you for your half-assed work if someone else can do it better. That's what America is all about. Our president may be a moron, but I'll be damned if I'm going to let any more jackasses sully the reputation of hard working Americans who are willing to work just as hard as anyone else with or without competition.
I believe i've already addressed this... We're not scared of the competition...
We just refuse to work for less than the Government Regulated Minimal Wage...or would like to be offered things like company provided unemployment insurance or health insurance.
Both of which aren't required if you hire illegals. If they get hurt... you take them home, and just don't pick them up till they are better again.
Quote:
And yes, maybe not to the extreme, but the similiarities of Hitler and Bush are pretty obvious.
He set off preemptive wars, and told the general mass it was solely to protect the 'homeland security.'
Hitler also passed the 'Enabling Act,' which went completely against the German Constitution, to allow them to take most civil liberties away from the German people.
Patriot Act ripoff, much?
Yes, i do understand your stance on this... But Hitler created a problem with a group of people in his mind. THERE IS A LEGITIMATE REASON WHY WE ARE IN IRAQ. (and no "That guy", once again... it is not for oil money...seriously... keep kicking that dead horse...
why dont you hop on a legitimate oil scandal... ill help.
http://www.slate.com/id/2111195/Given by the slate, an obviously left site.)
It is completely unfair to compare the two.
First... Hitler was a dictator. He killed 6 million un armed, defenseless human beings who provoked no one. They were merely a ladder for him to climb to success. Where Bush has ordered the death of NO innocent people. There are casualties of war.. that is a part of it. Innocents die.. it is unfortunate... that is war.
But Bush has not ordered our soldiers to mow down groups of civilians at a time and bury them in a mass grave site.
You would honestly have an easier time making a correlation between Hitler and Hussein.
Your currently just comparing apples to oranges.
Quote:
"An Evil exists that threatens every man, women, and child of this great nation. We must take steps to ensure our domestic security and protect our homeland."
Bush on the Patriot Act?
Lol. Try Hitler.
Yes, but Hitler didn't have a legitimate threat. He created a false sense of terror in the masses to manipulate them. They were sheep. Us as Americans are not. We are free thinking...and are not that stupid. We also have the ability to judge a legitimate threat... and Saddam we definitely a legitimate threat. Whether to us, surrounding countries, or the people who lived within his nation. People like that should not be allowed to rule and should be de-throned. He ordered the slaughtering of over 180,000 Kurds with chemical agents. If you wont do it...we will.
I stand 100% behind Bush on our decision to remove him from power.
Quote:
Also, a leader to do this would need to have a strong agenda. Bush has had the opportunity to have Osama's head on a stick, yet every time he has diddle-daddled over it. It's been seven years since 9/11, and we still don't have him. It's been 7 years also in this war... and our progress has gotten us no where.
I agree, we should have ended the Afghani bullshit... We could have had him a couple of times...
(I personally think that he's already dead...{he has been on Kidney Dialysis in a cave since the beginning of this thing.})
and...
Quote:
^ Umm the reason why there is so much tension in the Middle East is because of the presence of American Foreces. And yes, like Vietnam, the war in Iraq is unwinnable. Al Queda extremists only gained so much support and power after the US started invading.
this statement could be farther from the truth, there has been tension in the middle east since the beginning of time. But it all came to a head when Israel was created on holy ground. THAT is why the middle east hates the US.
Also, Vietnam was winnable, also... Iraq is winnable. We are not fighting. We are sending boys over there to die. They cannot shoot at people, they are so restricted that they cannot do anything but sit there and be shot at. If we wanted to fight, you would be amazed by our strength. Do not say that the US cannot win, for that is a ignorant statement. There is not a country in the world besides maybe China that can stand a chance against us if we chose to fight all out. If we were to put the necessary man power with the lack of restrictions in Iraq right now, we could be out of there in less than a year. Problem solved.